Trump more hostile to Canada than any other president: Frum
David Frum, staff writer at The Atlantic magazine, talks with Financial Post’s Larysa Harapyn about how to filter the fact from the fiction with Trump’s…
Thought Leader: David Frum
Historian Niall Ferguson: Military Preparedness is Key in Modern Geopolitics
Historian Niall Ferguson’s latest article published on February 3, 2024, presents a compelling argument for the importance of military preparedness in the face of emerging geopolitical challenges. Drawing from historical references, Ferguson underscores the essential role of security investments for nation-states to avoid strategic disasters, a lesson he believes the United Kingdom and other nations must heed.
Learning from History: The Case of General Sir Alan Brooke
Central to Ferguson’s narrative is the experience of General Sir Alan Brooke during World War II. Brooke’s role in the war serves as a stern warning about the perils of inadequate defense capabilities. The historian draws parallels between the collapse of empires in the past and the potential risks modern nations face, emphasizing the detrimental effects of neglecting military investment.
The ‘Axis of Ill Will’: An Emerging Threat
Ferguson critiques the notion of complacency in the face of an emerging threat from what he calls the ‘Axis of Ill Will.’ This geopolitical axis, according to Ferguson, comprises China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea. He supports his argument by citing recent statements from political and defense figures such as Donald Trump, UK Defence Secretary Grant Shapps, Nato’s Admiral Rob Bauer, German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius, and CIA director William Burns. All of them have voiced concerns about the geopolitical challenges and the need for military readiness.
Geopolitical Tensions: Echoes from the Past
Ferguson draws a sobering parallel between the geopolitical landscape of the pre-World War II era and the present day. He cites the specific concerns of Russia’s aggressive stance in Ukraine, the potential for Chinese action against Taiwan, and the overall erosion of U.S. manufacturing capacity relative to China. Ferguson’s historical lens reveals how neglecting military investment for economic reasons can lead to vulnerability and conflict, as exemplified by Britain’s delayed rearmament in the 1930s.
In the end, Ferguson drives home the enduring relevance of the Roman maxim ‘Si vis pacem, para bellum’ (If you want peace, prepare for war). This timeless wisdom, he argues, is especially pertinent in navigating the turbulent waters of current international relations.
Relevant and recent posts
Joseph Grogan: Medicare should cover Wegovy — but not negotiate its price
Price controls are a surefire way to crush innovation. President Biden took a groundbreaking step in proposing to cover GLP-1 obesity medications under Medicare and Medicaid in…
Thought Leader: Joseph Grogan
Anders Fogh Rasmussen: An alliance of democracies with India at its core
Europe and India need a more practical relationship; together, Europe, India and the United States can be unstoppable. By: Anders Fogh Rasmussen In the minutes…
Thought Leader: Anders Fogh Rasmussen
More with this speaker
Niall Ferguson: How to Win the New Cold War
Thought Leader: Niall Ferguson
Niall Ferguson: Diary of a Flying Scotsman
Thought Leader: Niall Ferguson
