Sanjay Gupta: Can Science and God Coexist?
Faith and science may often seem at odds with one another, but renowned geneticist and former NIH director, Dr. Francis Collins, says that he sees…
Thought Leader: Sanjay Gupta
On December 21, 1817, the poet John Keats wrote a letter that included a powerful concept: Something he called “negative capability,” meaning when someone “is capable of being in uncertainties, mysteries, doubts, without any irritable reaching after fact and reason.”
The idea is about embracing the unknown and resisting explaining away things we don’t yet understand. It’s a 200-year-old idea that is remarkably relevant today.
In our culture of performance and immediate answers, there is a focus on “positive” capabilities. It leads to an almost unbearable pressure to be fast and decisive. How can we re-embrace the power of negative capability?
I learned how to be “capable” at a very young age, or at least I thought I did. I learned how to revise to ace exams and get into elite universities. I practiced for hours each week to be an elite swimmer. I learned the skills to write two books in my thirties and to give talks at prestigious events. Throughout my career, society reinforced the idea that capability was synonymous with performance, outcomes, and achievement – what I knew and how well I did things.
It turns out, this is not what capability means.
“Capability,” like “capacity,” derives from the Latin word capax. It means “able to hold much.” It is grounded in the idea of “containing” or “spaciousness.” Imagine the space inside an enormous shipping container. Its internal space, how much it can hold, determines its capacity. As the Tao Te Ching says, “it is the emptiness within it that makes it useful.” Keats used “negative” to describe the space beyond what we know.
“Don’t play what’s there,” Miles Davis famously said. “Play what’s not there.”
Negative capability is a beautiful thing to look for in art, stories, or music. But the “negative” is often overlooked, underappreciated, or taken for granted. Some people — entrepreneurs, adventurers, artists, scientists, performers — have a gift for embracing negative capability as a space of possibility, a doorway to deeper investigation.
For Keats, Shakespeare was the perfect embodiment of his concept. His plays were full of mistaken identities and ambiguous endings with many possible meanings. He muddied the water with the shades of grey, the place in which actual life takes place. The great playwright wrote in the space beyond what we know — that’s where he found beauty, hope, and a new way of thinking.
But for most people, fear of the unknown is one of the greatest fears of all. We like to know how things will end — at the beginning.
Ironically, we need negative capability the most in situations where there is a lack of something. Peter Simpson, an associate professor in organization studies at Bristol Business School, identifies three key types of situations in which we need to use negative capability:
In these kinds of circumstances, the pressure to act quickly and decisively, especially for a leader, can be immense. Our “positive capabilities” reflexively kick into full gear. But as we’ve seen in spades since the pandemic, this type of leadership, which avoids difficult questions and represses doubts, can be ineffective, even dangerous. The need for speed and control can make decision-makers jump straight into the chaos without holding the space for insightful action to emerge.
When I first came across the term “negative capability,” I honestly thought it was an oxymoron. How can you be negative and capable? The concept sounded incongruous. But Keats used “negative” not in the pejorative sense, but to connote the ability to not to do something:
For the psychologist, Wilfred Bion, negative capability was about not giving in to the temptation to continually engage with the safety of the familiar.
“Discard the future tense of your desire: forget…both what you knew and what you want, to leave space for a new idea.” Beautiful.
As a child, I tried on multiple occasions to cut a magnet in half. I know… I quickly discovered you miraculously get another pair of poles; the positive and negative can’t be separated. Yet in life and leadership, that’s what we try to do.
It’s the negative pole of an electric current that is passive and receptive. It’s the open end that allows us to embrace the world’s mystery, uncertainty, and doubt. The pole requires deep vulnerability and trust to discover the freedom and choice that exists in the unknown.
There’s never a positive space without a negative in science and art, and the same can be said in life. Let’s learn how to reconnect our positive and negative capabilities.
Warmly,
Sanjay Gupta: Can Science and God Coexist?
Faith and science may often seem at odds with one another, but renowned geneticist and former NIH director, Dr. Francis Collins, says that he sees…
Thought Leader: Sanjay Gupta
Marc Short on what to expect from DOGE in relation to next year’s legislative agenda
Marc Short comments on what to expect from DOGE in relation to next year’s legislative agenda for CNBC. Looking for a great keynote or public…
Thought Leader: Marc Short
Marc Short on whether Musk has permanently changed how congressional communication functions
In this video, Marc Short joins CNBC to discuss whether Musk and Twitter have permanently changed how congressional communication functions and what to expect for…
Thought Leader: Marc Short