‘”Immigration is a large and complex subject. My recent story in The Atlantictried to do justice to that complexity. But that attempt of course came with a cost: The article was long and often highly detailed. It became easily possible to lose track of the piece’s argument.
So before replying to some of the article’s notable critics, let me recapitulate the argument as briefly as I can:
1) The economic benefits to Americans of America’s present immigration policies are very small. Almost all of those benefits are captured by the most affluent Americans.
2) The fiscal costs of present immigration policies are high. The argument that immigrants strengthen Social Security and Medicare is false. America’s bias in favor of low-skilled immigrants, legal and illegal, means that immigrants pay relatively little in taxes, while requiring a lot by way of services.”
3) The most important costs and benefits of immigration are neither economic nor fiscal, but social and political.”
Former prime minister Tony Abbott has called for stronger action on antisemitism in the wake of further attacks against the Jewish community, including tougher policing…
Marc Short, former White House Director of Legislative Affairs, offers his perspective on Elon Musk’s rumored third political party and how it could bring renewed…
Elon Musk wants to start a new political party and it’s already making waves. Ian Bremmer, political scientist and founder of Eurasia Group, provides unmatched…