Contact Us

U.S. Foreign Investment Policy Gets A Tougher But More Transparent CFIUS

Thought Leader: Harry Broadman
January 7, 2019
Source: Link

By Harry G. Broadman (original source Forbes)

“Throughout much of the past century the U.S. was a forceful, if not incessant voice in global fora of the belief that the more liberalized a country’s regulatory regime towards foreign investment, the stronger the prospects for economic growth, job creation and productivity. Washington largely walked the talk: U.S. policy towards inbound cross-border capital flows was the world’s beacon for market openness.  However, judging by some very high-profile policy decisions taken by the Trump Administration over the past two years by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the U.S. (CFIUS)–the interagency entity that assesses the national security implications of investments by foreigners in U.S. businesses–and a newly enacted law that significantly transforms the authority of CFIUS, it would seem that era is all but over.

CFIUS’ policy stance is undergoing two seemingly sudden and radical shifts.  One is a reversal towards greater restrictions as to which sectors and limitations on how much foreign investment are permitted—frankly, a change that, in certain circumstances, could well prove not to be the wisest course of action for the livelihood of U.S. businesses and workers.  The other is to inject far more transparency into the rules and procedures governing U.S. inbound foreign investment.  Regardless of what one might think of the substance of the new restrictions, bringing about more clarity of the governing process, a long-standing thorn in the side of investors (on both the foreign and domestic sides of a transaction), is a change with which it would be hard to quibble.”

Click here to read more

Subscribe to the WWSG newsletter.

Check Availability

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Speaker List
Share My List